Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tazmaniacs 09:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Ruzgar/EnArşiv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Ugur Basak 23:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
If you disable images in your browser, you will no longer risk inadvertantly seeing the images. Babajobu 23:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I see...well then go straight to the talkpage, or don't read this particular article. The Wikipedia Content disclaimer is very clear that Wikipedia contains content that will be offensive to some people. Christians have to deal with upsetting images at Piss Christ, Jews have to deal with upsetting images at Anti-semitism, Scientologists have to deal with upsetting images at Xenu, and I guess these images are upsetting to Muslims. That's life on the internet, I guess. Babajobu 00:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Ruzgar: if you get your many Muslim friends to vote to have the images banned/moved, then it will be banned/moved. This is how the democratic process works. L33th4x0r 00:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Ruzgar: for your interest, I have already voted to have the image of Muhammad (PBUH) removed and a link to the image put in place so that you won't see the image if you don't click on the link.
But unfortunatley, people holding my opinions are in the minority. Like I said, if you want to produce some real changes, you've got to get your Muslim friends to vote on the issue, that's the only way to make a voice in a democracy.
I heard there were thousands of people protesting on the grounds of Copenhagen, if they all voted here on Wikipedia, then it is extremely likely that the image will be banned. L33th4x0r 00:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Babykilledbypkk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Childwoundedbypkk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wikipedia must contains pictures. Wikipedia community published Mohammed's cartoons in the name of freedom of speech. Ruzgar 20:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes, and there are many others such as myself who thinks of that to be problematic.
I do not feel it is necesary to display photos on the PKK page. The terrorism PKK commited can be expressed with words, the Mohammed cartoons cannot. Generaly pictures of bloodshed and/or corpses are only necessary when there arent convincing arguments.
I understand exactly how you feel about the PKK, and I share your feelings to a degree however I do not believe the pictures are aproporate on the article.
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 3 hours. William M. Connolley 12:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey there -- please do not delete things they way you do. And please do not edit war, and read about the three-revert rule. --Moby 07:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ruzgar. If you feel that a claim needs to be proven, then simply add a {{fact}} tag to it, don't just delete it. Teşekkür ederim. —Khoikhoi 01:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
You did it again here! Please use {{fact}} tags instead. —Khoikhoi 16:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --InShaneee 18:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --InShaneee 01:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --InShaneee 01:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: This is your last warning. The next time you blank a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --InShaneee 01:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
The information you are removing appears to have sources, which means that it IS 'proven' as far as wikipedia is concerned (see WP:V). Either way, removing large amounts of text without consensus to do so on the talk page is a bad idea at best, and vandalism at worst. Additionally, this is considered vandalism. Adding such a severely POV image for the purpose of defaming a group is patently unacceptable. Consider this your last warning. --InShaneee 01:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Additionally, constantly reverting pages without discussion, especially when calling all content but your own 'vandalism', is unacceptable. If you continue this behavior when you return, you will simply be blocked again. --InShaneee 01:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|[[User:InShaneee|InShaneee]] block me becaues i have write things in Wikipedia opposite this admins ideology. He said I have been locked because "personal attacks, ethnic slurs, vandalism, blanking...". I have never make one of them. Please prove these claims. The other admins if this is really "free" Encyclopedia please unlock my account. Khoiko remove my photos wihthout showing a reason. [[Image:Babykilledbypkk.jpg]] this photo has no copyright problems and it is legal to publish. But Khoiko remove it contuinsly. I warn InShaneee but he makes nothing.}}
That is not a insult. That is a reality, that link is a lint to a racist group. <racist comments removed>. If you dont believe me please ask an Armenian user. Ruzgar 22:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Do not make racist comments about an ethnic group or your block will be extended. --InShaneee 22:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
I dont make racist comments. Please dont cencorn me. I try to only defend mysefl. Please don't remove thesee sentences and other admins decide is it a racist comment or not!~~
There's nothing to decide. Saying that an entire ethnic group is dedicated to genocide is racism, and not allowable. I've now blocked you for additional two days. If during this time you continue to make racist comments here, you will lose your editing privilages for this page, as well. Please try to be more respectful of other people. --InShaneee 23:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: You have now been blocked for 48 hours for vandalism. First off, the image you keep uploading is not copyright free, and if you upload it again in the future, you will be blocked without any warnings. Secondly, it is HIGHLY POV and quite obviously opposed by the other contributors to the pages you keep adding it to. WP:POV states that articles cannot take any stance, positive or negative on the issues they present. Slapping a picture of some dead babies at the top of an article you don't like just to make its subject look bad is not only slander, but it's against our policy. Additionally, you can't just do whatever you want on pages. If it appears there's opposition to adding something to a page, you must discuss it (civilly) with the other editors on the article talk page, and accept the results. --InShaneee 22:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
The picture has no copyright problem as I mentioned in picture's copyright section.
It is not POV If you thik that is POV then go and remove pictures inArmenian Genocide article.
I have write also in discuss(civilly(!)) page but no one answers me. The user Khoiko right after I have been blocked. I think you are work like a team.
Just because you're blocked doesn't mean you get to continue making personal attacks and racist comments. Keep it up, and your block will be extended and you will lose your right to edit this page, as well. --InShaneee 23:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Unblock denied - take some time and calm down -- Tawker 23:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I dont need to calm down. I am rightful here and I have right to describe a admin as a dictator who blocks users for his personel ideologie. Show me a reason why this image removed and i have been blocked. Ruzgar 23:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Your unblock has been denied, do NOT readd that tag. And this is your last warning, do not make personal attacks. --InShaneee 23:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Your talk page has now been protected to keep you from making more personal attacks while blocked. Additionally, for that incivility, I am now extending your block to one week. --InShaneee 23:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
For re-adding a heavily disputed and clearly POV image the second your block expired, I have blocked you for one month. --InShaneee 17:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I am no admin but I do want to help you, but you need to make it possible.
Calling an admin a "dictator", "racist", anti-turk, etc does not help us create a better encyclopedia. I want you to apologise from InShaneee. I will try to convince InShaneee to shorten/lift your block if you promise you wont continue the "revert war" and stay civil.
As for the image, I dont think it is aproporate on the PKK article. It is also inapproporate for Armenian Genocide to have similar images of corpses. However the way to remove the images do not go throughthe PKK article. I will talk to InShaneee about this.
You may want to stop attempting to circumvent your block. This will not go unnoticed, be permitted, nor have any good results whatsoever. If this keeps up, I'm going to have to bump up your block again. --InShaneee 05:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, they were discussing the page User:Grue/List of ethnic stereotypes#Turks. You are welcome to proposes an MfD of the page or remove the most upsetting entries. On the other hand, in my humble opinion discussing the best way to edit such a page is hardly an ethnic insult per se. You are welcome to ask an opinion of another administrator abakharev 04:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
MFD=WP:MFD=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Since this page is not in the article namespace nor a category, nor a template, etc., then if you want to delete it, it is the place to go. The page might hurt but it is clearly intended to be a joke and all the nations are represented more or less equally there. abakharev 08:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
