Dosya:Edmund Muskie (D-ME).jpg
Tam çözünürlük ((2.867 × 1.983 piksel, dosya boyutu: 1,85 MB, MIME tipi: image/jpeg))
Bu dosya Wikimedia Commons'ta bulunmaktadır. Dosyanın açıklaması aşağıda gösterilmiştir. Commons, serbest/özgür telifli medya dosyalarının bulundurulduğu depodur. Siz de yardım edebilirsiniz. |
Bu medya dosyası silinmesi için aday gösterilmiştir Adaylık tarihi: 11 Haziran 2024. Silme tartışmasına katılmak için, adaylık sayfasını ziyaret ediniz.
Lütfen bu şablonu adaylık bitinceye kadar kaldırmayınız. Adaylığın nedeni: Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bettmann_Archive_photos. All photos nominated here are post-1963 US images, ranging from 1964 to the 1980s. These photos claim to be in the public domain due to 'lack of notice' using the {{PD-US-no notice}} template. However, there is little to no proof of that.
My main concern is not that we are violating the copyright of a stock site, but that there is not enough proof these images actually meet the PD no-notice tag criteria. I am not denying they were published, rather the 'no notice' claims are hard to prove and assumptions are being made here. The first problem is that we cannot see the entire print, sheet or strip to verify the lack of notice claims. The copyright notice would not be on the photo like a watermark; it would be elsewhere. Getty only shows the high-resolution scan of the front. An example of an image that shows no notice, this UPI photo: File:Senator Ross Bass "On the Job!" (1965 UPI press photo).jpg, can be seen on the rear. Most of these photographs from the Bettmann Archive could very well be public domain, but without seeing the whole photo or its backside where a notice might be, its copyright status is uncertain. Assuming it's public domain without further verification is risky. The second problem is that almost all photos are credited to an 'unknown author.' How are we supposed to know who took the photo? Otto Bettmann was the collector of these photos, not the creator or copyright holder, and neither is Getty. Many photos come from various sources and creators, and I did see some that are credited to UPI, a press agency, so perhaps other copies exist elsewhere. This is also problematic for photos from 1978 and later, as we cannot really search for registrations. For pre-1964 photos, we can search for renewals, so it is not the same concern as with the 1964-1989 photos. Essentially, any and all photos could be Public Domain, but there is a serious lack of evidence to back up those claims. I am making this mass DR as I have doubts on the freedom of these files, but also for a consensus. What do we do with all these photos? There are millions more in the archive that could be useful to the Commons. Would love to hear others opinions on this. | |||
Daha fazla ayrıntı için lütfen buraya tıklayın
Bu şablonun sayfanın solundaki Araçlar menüsünün altına "Nominate for deletion (Silinmeye Aday)" yazısını eklediğine emin olun. Bu durum, tüm sayfaların gerekli şekilde oluşturulduğunu belirtmektedir. Şayet bu sayfalar veya menüdeki yazı ("Nominate for deletion (Silinmeye Aday)") oluşturulmamışsa ya da kendiniz bu şablonu elle eklerseniz, aşağıdaki adımları tamamlamanız gerekir:
{{subst:delete2|image=Files found with Bettmann|reason=Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bettmann_Archive_photos. All photos nominated here are post-1963 US images, ranging from 1964 to the 1980s. These photos claim to be in the public domain due to 'lack of notice' using the {{PD-US-no notice}} template. However, there is little to no proof of that.
My main concern is not that we are violating the copyright of a stock site, but that there is not enough proof these images actually meet the PD no-notice tag criteria. I am not denying they were published, rather the 'no notice' claims are hard to prove and assumptions are being made here. The first problem is that we cannot see the entire print, sheet or strip to verify the lack of notice claims. The copyright notice would not be on the photo like a watermark; it would be elsewhere. Getty only shows the high-resolution scan of the front. An example of an image that shows no notice, this UPI photo: File:Senator Ross Bass "On the Job!" (1965 UPI press photo).jpg, can be seen on the rear. Most of these photographs from the Bettmann Archive could very well be public domain, but without seeing the whole photo or its backside where a notice might be, its copyright status is uncertain. Assuming it's public domain without further verification is risky. The second problem is that almost all photos are credited to an 'unknown author.' How are we supposed to know who took the photo? Otto Bettmann was the collector of these photos, not the creator or copyright holder, and neither is Getty. Many photos come from various sources and creators, and I did see some that are credited to UPI, a press agency, so perhaps other copies exist elsewhere. This is also problematic for photos from 1978 and later, as we cannot really search for registrations. For pre-1964 photos, we can search for renewals, so it is not the same concern as with the 1964-1989 photos. Essentially, any and all photos could be Public Domain, but there is a serious lack of evidence to back up those claims. I am making this mass DR as I have doubts on the freedom of these files, but also for a consensus. What do we do with all these photos? There are millions more in the archive that could be useful to the Commons. Would love to hear others opinions on this.}} ~~~~
Toplu (Kitlesel) silmeler için: Eğer birden fazla dosyayı aday göstermek istiyorsanız, toplu silme istekleri sayfasına giderek elle {{delete|reason=write reason|subpage=write name|year=2024|month=June|day=18}} kodunu tüm resimler için ekledikten sonra imzanızı atarak talepte bulunun. (Toplu silme isteği yardımına buradan ulaşabilirsiniz). Not: Bu şablon dosyanın silinmesi için tartışma yapılmasını gerektirmektedir. Eğer dosyanın hızlı silinmesini istiyorsanız hızlı silme kriterlerinden uygun olanı şablonda {{speedy|buraya}} yazarak kullanabilirsiniz.
|
Özet
AçıklamaEdmund Muskie (D-ME).jpg | Washington: Back from a four-nation overseas tour, Senator Edmund Muskie (D-ME), tells a news conference he no longer favored the unilateral withdrawal of U.S. troops from Europe. "I am having second thoughts now," Muskie said. "My view has been changed somewhat because of this trip." | ||||
Tarih | |||||
Kaynak | Bettmann Archive[1] | ||||
Yazar | N/A; Dedicated to the Bettmann Archives | ||||
İzin (Bu dosyanın tekrar kullanımı) |
The Bettmann archives does not hold the copyright to their photos; and the images do not have copyright notices.[2]
|
||||
Diğer sürümler |
|
- ↑ https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/back-from-a-four-nation-overseas-tour-senator-edmund-muskie-news-photo/515291574
- ↑ https://www3.wcl.american.edu/cni/0001/24223.html#:~:text=The%20Archives%2C%20encompassing%20more%20than,and%20others%20still%20under%20copyright.
Bu dosyada gösterilen öğeler
betimlenen
18 Ocak 1971
image/jpeg
Dosya geçmişi
Dosyanın herhangi bir zamandaki hâli için ilgili tarih/saat kısmına tıklayın.
Tarih/Saat | Küçük resim | Boyutlar | Kullanıcı | Yorum | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
güncel | 13.48, 23 Şubat 2023 | 2.867 × 1.983 (1,85 MB) | AlaskaGALT | {{Information |Description= Washington: Back from a four-nation overseas tour, Senator Edmund Muskie (D-ME), tells a news conference he no longer favored the unilateral withdrawal of U.S. troops from Europe. "I am having second thoughts now," Muskie said. "My view has been changed somewhat because of this trip." |Source= Bettmann Archive<ref>https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/back-from-a-four-nation-overseas-tour-senator-edmund-muskie-news-photo/515291574</ref> |Date= 18th Januar... |
Dosya kullanımı
Bu görüntü dosyasına bağlanan sayfa yok.
Meta veri
Bu dosyada, muhtemelen fotoğraf makinesi ya da tarayıcı tarafından eklenmiş ek bilgiler mevcuttur. Eğer dosyada sonradan değişiklik yapıldıysa, bazı bilgiler yeni değişikliğe göre eski kalmış olabilir.
JPEG dosyası yorumu | CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100 |
---|